![]() This phenomenon highlighted potential advantages to incorporating telemedicine into long-term healthcare, while also underscoring the significance and impact of the digital divide on healthcare access. Non-urgent aspects of breast cancer care were reallocated to remote services or postponed to minimize infectious exposure and maximize hospital capacity for emergencies. ![]() The COVID-19 pandemic was a catalyst for expanded utilization of telemedicine however, it also uncovered additional racial disparities within the American healthcare system and among communities nationwide. ![]() Further research is essential to elucidate best practices in breast cancer telehealth approaches in underserved communities. With increased accessibility, resource allocation, and improved digital infrastructure, telehealth can be used to address disparities in early detection, quality of breast cancer care, treatment adherence, and risk assessment. SummaryĮliminating the digital divide holds enormous potential for mitigating breast cancer disparities through an intentional focus on improving access to telehealth. Telehealth can also be used as an approach to risk reduction, with strategies to support weight management and genetic testing. ![]() Previous studies provide examples of telehealth utilization for increasing screening mammography, in addition to improving access to breast cancer care, including breast cancer specialist, nurse navigators, and clinical trials. There is a paucity of research specific to employing telehealth to address breast cancer disparities. This review evaluates the impact of the digital divide on breast cancer outcomes, as well as strategies for leveraging telehealth to reduce breast cancer disparities. However, unequal access to high-speed/broadband internet service and telehealth itself magnifies breast cancer disparities in vulnerable populations. Telehealth has the potential to mitigate breast cancer disparities by increasing access to specialty care and health information. Regret is an emotion pivotal for decision making, and its cognitive underpinning has and continues to be elucidated in research focusing on counterfactual thinking.Socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and minority groups suffer from high breast cancer mortality, a disparity caused by decreased access to specialty care, lower treatment adherence, co-morbidities, and genetic predisposition for biologically aggressive breast tumor subtypes. Third, the opportunity principle offers a particularly clear means of summarizing the regulatory consequences of the regret experience. Second, the distinction between regrets of action versus inaction is best understood in terms of motivational implications, particularly with regard to Higgin's (1998) distinction between promotion and prevention focus. First, the overall arch of any regret theory must be situated within an understanding of behavior regulation. We have no substantive disagreement with their theory, but instead offer 3 observations to further aid regret researchers studying consumer decision making. Regret is an emotion pivotal for decision making, and its cognitive underpinning has and continues to be elucidated in research focusing on counterfactual thinking.ĪB - Zeelenberg and Pieter's (2007) regret regulation theory 1.0 offers a synthesis that brings together concepts spanning numerous literatures. N2 - Zeelenberg and Pieter's (2007) regret regulation theory 1.0 offers a synthesis that brings together concepts spanning numerous literatures. Preparation of this paper was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant R01-MH055578. Order of authorship for the second and third authors was determined with a coin toss.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |